Reading Room
Filter by topic
- COVID-19 12
- European Union 1
- accc 22
- access 4
- agency 1
- algorithms 2
- artificial intelligence 1
- authorisation 6
- bid rigging 1
- big data 2
- cartels 28
- cases 4
- class action 1
- code of conduct 1
- collective bargaining 2
- competition law (general) 10
- competition policy 57
- competitive neutrality 1
- concerted practices 5
- consumer data 1
- criminal penalties 3
- digital platforms 30
- economics 6
- exclusionary conduct 1
- exclusive dealing 1
- expert evidence 1
- extraterritoriality 1
- federal court 1
- gun-jumping 1
- harper report 2
- immunity 2
- infrastructure 1
- institutions 2
- intellectual property 10
- investigation 1
- joint ventures 1
- legislation 2
- litigation 4
- market definition 2
- market power 2
- mergers 32
- misuse of market power 18
- new zealand 1
- news media 1
- notification 2
- penalties 3
- pharmaceutical 2
- private enforcement 1
- process 1
- public enforcement 9
Readings lists can be found following the links below
Some thoughts about proof in competition cases
Justice Jayne M Jagot, ‘Some thoughts about proof in competition cases’ (speech, 18th Annual Competition Law and Economics Workshop, 15 October 2021 (online))
Competitive Solutions for COVID-19
Alex Sundakov, ‘Competitive Solutions for COVID-19’ (2021) 29(3) Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law 198
Ahead of the curve
Andrea Coscelli, ‘Ahead of the curve’ (speech delivered (virtually), Bannerman Competition Lecture, 9 February 2021
Exclusionary conduct in competition law: a consequence-sensitive deontological account
Barbora Jedličková and Jonathan Crowe, ‘Exclusionary conduct in competition law: a consequence-sensitive deontological account’ (2020) Jurisprudence (published online 23 November 2020)
Problems Associated with Joint Expert Reports for “Hot Tubs”
Christopher Pleatsikas, ‘Problems Associated with Joint Expert Reports for “Hot Tubs”’ (2019) 27(3) AJCCL 176
Merger Authorisation Processes in Australia in Light of the Tabcorp Decision
Dave Poddar, ‘Merger Authorisation Processes in Australia in Light of the Tabcorp Decision (It's Hip to Be Square – Hipster Economics and Antitrust)’ (2019) 27(1) Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law 13