Reading Room
Filter by topic
- COVID-19 12
- European Union 1
- accc 22
- access 4
- agency 1
- algorithms 2
- artificial intelligence 1
- authorisation 6
- bid rigging 1
- big data 2
- cartels 28
- cases 4
- class action 1
- code of conduct 1
- collective bargaining 2
- competition law (general) 10
- competition policy 57
- competitive neutrality 1
- concerted practices 5
- consumer data 1
- criminal penalties 3
- digital platforms 30
- economics 6
- exclusionary conduct 1
- exclusive dealing 1
- expert evidence 1
- extraterritoriality 1
- federal court 1
- gun-jumping 1
- harper report 2
- immunity 2
- infrastructure 1
- institutions 2
- intellectual property 10
- investigation 1
- joint ventures 1
- legislation 2
- litigation 4
- market definition 2
- market power 2
- mergers 32
- misuse of market power 18
- new zealand 1
- news media 1
- notification 2
- penalties 3
- pharmaceutical 2
- private enforcement 1
- process 1
- public enforcement 9
Readings lists can be found following the links below
Pay-for-delay Arrangements in the Pharmaceutical Industry …
Diana Biscoe, Rosie Finlayson, Andrew Christopher, ‘Pay-for-delay Arrangements in the Pharmaceutical Industry: How Will They Be Treated under Australian Competition Law?’ (2023) 31(2) Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law 111
Pay for delay 2.0: Anticompetitive early generic entry agreements in the Australian pharmaceutical sector
Sven Gallasch ‘Pay for delay 2.0: Anticompetitive early generic entry agreements in the Australian pharmaceutical sector’ (2023) 30(1) Competition and Consumer Law Journal 44
ACCC Guidelines on repeal of section 51(3) could not and do not resolve need for competitor supply/acquisition exception to cartel prohibitions under CCA
Brent Fisse, ‘ACCC Guidelines on repeal of section 51(3) could not and do not resolve need for competitor supply/acquisition exception to cartel prohibitions under CCA’ (July 2020)
The Repeal of Section 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act: A Mistake in Need of Correction
Arlen Duke, ‘The Repeal of Section 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act: A Mistake in Need of Correction’ (2020) 43(1) UNSW Law Journal 250
Protecting Profits Post-Patent Expiry
Arlen Duke and Rhonda L Smith, ‘Protecting Profits Post-Patent Expiry: ACCC v Pfizer, Patents and Competition Law’ (2019) 30(1) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 26
The repeal of s 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Michael O’Bryan, ‘The repeal of s 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)’ (2019) 46(9) Brief (Law Society of Western Australia) 20-23
Protecting Profits Post-Patent Expiry: ACCC v Pfizer, Patents and Competition Law
Arlen Duke and Rhonda L Smith, ‘Protecting Profits Post-Patent Expiry: ACCC v Pfizer, Patents and Competition Law’ (2019) 30(1) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 26
Intellectual Property and Competition Law - Nothing Special?
Robert French, ‘Intellectual property and competition law: Nothing special?’ (2019) 117 Intellectual Property Forum 54-57
Harper Report Implementation Breakdown: Repeal of Section 51(3) ...
Brent Fisse, ‘Harper Report Implementation Breakdown: Repeal of Section 51(3) of Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and Lack of Proposed Supply/Acquisition Agreement Cartel Exception’ (2019) 47 ABLR 127
The Repeal of s 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Michael O’Bryan, ‘The Repeal of s 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)’ (LESANZ Breakfast Meeting, 10 April 2019)